|
Post by hengest on Sept 28, 2015 22:29:35 GMT -5
Well, it couldn't be helped -- a thread on LOTR.
I was stunned a few years ago by the pretty obvious revelation that the adventure in Moria is a major source for the 'dungeon' as we know it in fantasy RPGs. Further, it seems to have the same mythic shadow about it that the Underworld does in booklet 3. A deep place filled with monsters -- and things worse and more mysterious than monsters, some of which you don't even get to.
Further, the party comes down off a mountain and descends into the earth...but the party comes in at ground level and exits at the same level, while Gandalf descends to the very foundations of stone and exits at the peak, far above the earth, spanning more vertical space than anyone else (in the entire book?). Seems to be the sort of thing, apparently laden with meaning
What observations has anyone been dying to share about LOTR? Or what obvious or non-obvious connections between LOTR and the roots of this hobby?
|
|
|
Post by Admin Pete on Sept 29, 2015 11:27:54 GMT -5
I have seen posts over the years where people characterize the LotR as slow moving and boring and yet when I read it - to me it is an exciting, riveting story the I can't put down. Back when I was a single man it was normal for me to read all three books in one sitting. Now that I am older and married, I am no longer able to do that and it is sooooooo difficult for me to put it down and go to bed at a reasonable time. I suppose an exciting story is in the mind of the reader.
|
|
|
Post by hengest on Sept 29, 2015 12:57:10 GMT -5
I've seen that sort of thing, too, and I have to agree with The Perilous Dreamer that I've never found the basic story anything but gripping. And I can't attribute it to nostalgia or enjoying a movie or other adaptation as a kid, because I didn't read the novel til I was 22 and had seen the first two PJ movies, but couldn't follow them and didn't really enjoy them. I've read academic articles on the book, some of which are good, and taken my own notes to investigate aspects of the book that interest me but aren't exactly "the story", and read the work itself many times now, but the basic story I just can't see as boring in any place. On a given reading there will be one of two brief passages (a page, tops) that I find falls a little flat for me, but then on the next reading it's something else, and the previously "slightly boring" bit seems just fine. I've read a couple things that point out Tolkien's mastery of ratcheting up and then releasing tension again and again and again. One of the pieces was an essay by Ursula Le Guin in which she examined mostly "Fog on the Barrow-Downs". A lot of readers today are accustomed to experiencing this sort of thing as uncool or unacceptable, and prefer a story with more obviously character-driven conflict. That's cool, but I still find LOTR a unique work that is not of the same type as any of its many sources, and certainly isn't the same type (for good or bad) as anything in the last hundred years of fantasy that I've ever read.
|
|
|
Post by makofan on Oct 5, 2015 13:08:21 GMT -5
LOTR started out as a sequel to the hobbit, and thus it is really a picaresque. Critics hate these (a picaresque is a work with a lot of self-contained short stories shoe-horned into one longer work, like Don Quixote, for example). However, Tolkien managed to bring the gravitas of a well-founded history that tapped into mythological roots, and an overarching or ur-theme, to lift it to a higher level.
At least that's my take. Appendix A rocks
|
|
|
Post by hengest on Oct 5, 2015 18:31:14 GMT -5
Not once have I thought of LOTR this way, but I see what you mean. It is indeed pretty episodic. And Appendix A does rock. No one now puts the emotional climax of their novel into an appendix...
I do think the episodes are deeply linked, however, which is why I'm having trouble really taking it as a picaresque. I may post a little more about this.
|
|
|
Post by hengest on Oct 8, 2015 18:26:43 GMT -5
tetramorph, The Semi-Retired Gamer, makofan, Admin Pete: Okay, a brief follow-up. To recap: I see why one can call LOTR episodic. It is fairly episodic. It's pretty easy to locate just about any event or even most dialogue by chapter because the chapter-titles are fairly obviously keyed to the main events of the chapters. For its size, it's a "small" book in that way. But I don't think it's modular (where "modular" = "consisting of largely independent parts that can in principle be remove or swapped out), which keeps it from being closely related to picaresques. In my examples, I'll show relations between apparently unrelated episodes that unite them down in the belly of the work. Example 1) This looks like a throwaway line. But look back at "Farewell to Lorien" in Book II, where Sam's quoting from: So, it looks like it wasn't Haldir, but some other Elf of Lorien. But Sam refers to the speaker as "Haldir, or one of those folk." But who cares? Well, you can see it as Sam's being revenged on Elves for the episode in "Many Meetings": Some random (to Sam) Elf says all mortals seem alike. Sam is asleep during this, but present. I guess he absorbs it in his sleep and later "bites back", though very gently. Elf saying mortals all seem alike -- mortal failing to distinguish one Elf from another. Then very "revenge" is tied to this bit in "The Mirror of Galadriel": Frodo (says Galadriel in Sam's hearing) is "revenged" for her testing of him in the previous chapter. Some time later, Sam is (very gently) revenged against Elves for the somewhat dismissive comment in "Many Meetings". Example 2) Gollum exhorts Sauron to "go to sleep". We have seen a "consumption" villain* told to go to sleep before: Sauron and Old Man Willow: Old Man Willow swallows Pippin up, while Merry is less swallowed. Sauron has direct contact with Pippin through the palantir. Aragorn notes that in an alternate turn of events, Merry might have been the one so threatened: Two villains are told to go to sleep. Each of them has deep, potentially destructive contact with Pippin, while Merry is threatened in an alternate timeline or just by being less tasty. Well, the book is just thick with this stuff, rather than being only a "Middle-Earth's Greatest Hits" with unrelated episodes strung together. It is episodic, but the episodes are deeply interrelated. *I call them both "consumption villains" because Old Man Willow tries to eat Merry and Pippin, and Gollum says of Sauron that he will "eat all the world":
|
|