|
|
Post by robkuntz on May 28, 2018 16:27:39 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2018 19:46:59 GMT -5
Well, well, well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin Pete on May 29, 2018 0:48:25 GMT -5
Coming along!
|
|
|
|
Post by mormonyoyoman on May 29, 2018 21:09:24 GMT -5
I'm neither Sam Spade nor Kreskin, but Osterlind trained me in mentalism. |
|
|
|
Post by antoine on May 30, 2018 3:58:41 GMT -5
I am ready.
|
|
|
|
Post by robkuntz on May 30, 2018 9:02:13 GMT -5
The 2nd book will appear to blur the lines between fact and fiction even as it is told as fact. Nathalie and I are discussing what style to use, I have many, and it appears that the story will have certain speeds like a car and thus the style would appear, at first grounding, to exemplify what is to come but only to change gears as the car starts veering this way and that into and out of chaos. It's going to be an interesting challenge compressing all of this matter, which is SUMPTUOUS, into a style that will be sometimes reserved and quite sober which then, due to chaos and speed changes, edges towards gonzo. Go with the flow writing.
The book matter is also being annotated for a screenplay treatment.
|
|
|
|
Post by robkuntz on May 30, 2018 9:08:03 GMT -5
With the First Book. I am deep into describing a Tractics scenario battle report--Breakthrough to the Bridge. After that comes a Napoleonics battle report.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin Pete on May 30, 2018 9:16:57 GMT -5
That sounds awesome and I wish they were already in my hands.
|
|
|
|
Post by robkuntz on May 30, 2018 17:00:45 GMT -5
That sounds awesome and I wish they were already in my hands. As I finish the first I keep chomping at the bit for the second, Notes are good, but I think a Foreword is in the not so distant future. Something that has in it, "It wasn't about the products; it was about the people, all of their dreams, emotions, egos, child-hood negativity, hubris, disloyalty, dishonesty and sometimes just plain ineptitude. It wasn't exactly what Mary Gygax told me years later, that her husband had "changed". It's that he hadn't." |
|
