Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2018 21:27:57 GMT -5
I honestly don't even think it was that well thought out. More like expecting jousting to be like tic tac toe or rock paper scissors.
|
|
|
|
Post by mormonyoyoman on May 7, 2018 21:39:18 GMT -5
"Does it have to be honest?"
|
|
|
|
Post by Mighty Darci on May 14, 2018 22:03:56 GMT -5
The shift from concentration on the conceptual to concentration on the mechanical has resulted in 90% of all gaming posts on all forums being absolutely irrelevant niggling over rules. A recent thread on ODD74 had somebody complaining about "problems" in the CHAINMAIL jousting rules because not all defensive positions were equally good. I asked what historical data the poster had on jousting, which killed the thread, fortunately. But the notion persists everywhere that "all choices must be valid." Choices involve tradeoff, but most people don't want to have to make tradeoffs. Where IRL are all choices valid? Never in the history of the world is, I believe, the correct answer. |
|
