|
|
Post by tetramorph on Jan 20, 2015 18:45:32 GMT -5
Admin Pete, I suggest we edit the title for the folder to: "Eldritch Wizardry; Gods, Demi-Gods & Heroes; Swords & Spells" I suggest the following descriptor: "Discuss the official supplements especially as they pertain to campaigns and settings"
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin Pete on Jan 20, 2015 20:21:30 GMT -5
Admin Pete, I suggest we edit the title for the folder to: "Eldritch Wizardry; Gods, Demi-Gods & Heroes; Swords & Spells" I suggest the following descriptor: "Discuss the official supplements especially as they pertain to campaigns and settings" Done! |
|
|
|
Post by tetramorph on Jan 21, 2015 12:29:02 GMT -5
Awesome, Admin Pete, thanks! And what do you think about my change of title idea? I just think it cleans it up a bit. Again: "Eldritch Wizardry; Gods, Demi-Gods & Heroes; Swords & Spells" |
|
|
|
Post by Admin Pete on Jan 21, 2015 13:01:40 GMT -5
Awesome, Admin Pete, thanks! And what do you think about my change of title idea? I just think it cleans it up a bit. Again: "Eldritch Wizardry; Gods, Demi-Gods & Heroes; Swords & Spells" Sorry I missed it, Done! |
|
|
|
Post by Mr Darke on Feb 2, 2015 23:44:26 GMT -5
Is there any reason Greyhawk and Blackmoor are not listed?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Semi-Retired Gamer on Feb 3, 2015 5:30:12 GMT -5
Is there any reason Greyhawk and Blackmoor are not listed? They are in the Official Campaigns and Campaign Settings area further down the page.  |
|
|
|
Post by Admin Pete on Feb 3, 2015 7:23:07 GMT -5
Is there any reason Greyhawk and Blackmoor are not listed? They are in the Official Campaigns and Campaign Settings area further down the page. Yeah, what he said!   Thank you for asking, questions are welcome here!  |
|
|
|
Post by finarvyn on Feb 3, 2015 19:43:23 GMT -5
However, keep in mind that the Greyhawk and Blackmoor supplements had very little to do with the Greyhawk and Blackmoor campaigns. Well, Blackmoor has the Temple of the Frog in it, but on the other hand Eldritch Wizardry contains a bunch of Greyhawk artifacts. In other words, EW has more "Greyhawk campaign" than the Greyhawk supplement. I'd be tempted to take one of a couple routes of organization: (1) Put all rules discussion in one section, whether they be white box or supplement. (2) Put white box in one section, supplements in another. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin Pete on Feb 3, 2015 22:37:18 GMT -5
However, keep in mind that the Greyhawk and Blackmoor supplements had very little to do with the Greyhawk and Blackmoor campaigns. Well, Blackmoor has the Temple of the Frog in it, but on the other hand Eldritch Wizardry contains a bunch of Greyhawk artifacts. In other words, EW has more "Greyhawk campaign" than the Greyhawk supplement. I'd be tempted to take one of a couple routes of organization: (1) Put all rules discussion in one section, whether they be white box or supplement. (2) Put white box in one section, supplements in another. You are quite correct! (kind of a shame too that it is true) Can you imagine if the Blackmoor supplement had, had a lot of material in it that ended up in the First Fantasy Campaign and something similar for the Greyhawk Supplement. I may move things around some yet. Right now I think I will just see what kind of discussion we get and then I will shuffle it some as needed. That will give me some time to see which suggestion looks like the best way to go. |
|
Thank you for asking, questions are welcome here! 
