|
Post by captaincrumbcake on Mar 19, 2018 23:49:26 GMT -5
There is this, in Men & Magic, p.6:
And then, there is this (ditto, p.10):
So the question is: What was the purpose for this in relation to the campaign setting? Did the authors of the game actually practice this? And if so, how did it affect their campaign; for the better, or worse? Did their apprentice-acolytes abide by this notion? If so, how did it affect their game? If not--why? (If Mr. Mornard, or Kuntz, would like to respond, such would be appreciated.)
|
|
|
Post by robkuntz on Mar 20, 2018 5:48:04 GMT -5
The simple idea that a higher ability score in one of the categories might influence your choice of what class to play; Gary should have had these sentences closer to each other (like on the same page), and the last should have occurred first in an integrated paragraph. Why he suggested that DMs roll to determine scores is perplexing, as we all rolled our dice to do so in front of him; and this carried on in front of the DMs, so when Michael finally leapt into the playtests he rolled for Gronan's, etc.
|
|