|
|
Post by The Semi-Retired Gamer on Dec 4, 2016 18:42:27 GMT -5
I'm doing some work on my AiF project and I'm curious about whether people prefer one, two, or several volumes to the core rules. Feel free to explain your thoughts if you feel it's necessary.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin Pete on Dec 4, 2016 19:56:01 GMT -5
I like the several volume if they are the digest sized books or the DM/Player split with larger books.
|
|
|
|
Post by Traveroark on Dec 7, 2016 13:53:21 GMT -5
I voted for the third option.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stormcrow on Dec 10, 2016 19:52:15 GMT -5
For the most part, players don't read books, so a player/judge split isn't helpful.
Split into topics only if the judge is likely to need only one broad topic at a time. Having to consult two books at once is annoying.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin Pete on Dec 10, 2016 22:57:41 GMT -5
For the most part, players don't read books, so a player/judge split isn't helpful. Split into topics only if the judge is likely to need only one broad topic at a time. Having to consult two books at once is annoying. Not voting??  |
|
|
|
Post by Stormcrow on Dec 11, 2016 7:41:32 GMT -5
I voted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin Pete on Dec 11, 2016 9:01:45 GMT -5
OK, I was confused, based on your post I was looking for a vote for option 1, it didn't occur to me that you would have voted option 3.  Myself, I always opt for the 3LBB approach. |
|
|
|
Post by Stormcrow on Dec 11, 2016 14:12:29 GMT -5
My vote is to break books into self-contained topics, UNLESS the topics are intertwined enough to require cross-referencing (in which case they aren't really self-contained). Let form follow function; don't just mimic D&D.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hexenritter Verlag on Feb 2, 2018 3:15:26 GMT -5
I didn't vote because it is closed but I'd prefer multiple books or two books split between player & Referee stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by Willy Wort on Sept 28, 2018 20:17:05 GMT -5
I didn't vote because it is closed but I'd prefer multiple books or two books split between player & Referee stuff. It wasn't closed just now. I voted option 3. The Semi-Retired Gamer what happened to this? Did you complete it or is it still in progress? |
|
|
|
Post by The Semi-Retired Gamer on Oct 1, 2018 9:47:46 GMT -5
I didn't vote because it is closed but I'd prefer multiple books or two books split between player & Referee stuff. It wasn't closed just now. I voted option 3. The Semi-Retired Gamer what happened to this? Did you complete it or is it still in progress? Never fear - still in progress. |
|
|
|
Post by El Borak on Oct 1, 2018 14:50:29 GMT -5
It wasn't closed just now. I voted option 3. The Semi-Retired Gamer what happened to this? Did you complete it or is it still in progress? Never fear - still in progress. How far along is it? How can we encourage you? |
|
|
|
Post by The Semi-Retired Gamer on Oct 6, 2018 11:02:44 GMT -5
Never fear - still in progress. How far along is it? How can we encourage you? Now that the summer OT season is over I am going to hit it hard so updates will start showing up soon.... |
|
|
|
Post by El Borak on Oct 6, 2018 11:44:04 GMT -5
How far along is it? How can we encourage you? Now that the summer OT season is over I am going to hit it hard so updates will start showing up soon.... I'll give you an exalt for the anticipation of what is too come! |
|
|
|
Post by ripx187 on Dec 10, 2018 18:34:52 GMT -5
Nice topic! I am of the school that dictates that nothing good can come about the player's knowing the rules. Give me an idea of what you want to do, I'll give it some machanics if it needs to be randomized, and don't give me none of that Storygame mumbo jumbo because I don't buy it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mighty Darci on Jan 3, 2019 21:52:28 GMT -5
I like the idea of digest sized books and only as many volumes as needed due to page limits for digest size.
|
|
Myself, I always opt for the 3LBB approach. 
